My endorsements are based upon my research of the candidates positions, assessment of their public statements, and predictions on how they will impact the people.
Candidates who are most in line with my values and goals win my endorsement.
So what are my values? That's a good question for you to ask, especially if you are taking my word on these candidates. I value candidates who I feel can do the most good for the most amount of people. I define "good" as uplifting and protecting the people of our country. Some issues I think are important are:
peace and prevention of international conflict
rescue and care for Americans in crisis
economic opportunities for jobseekers and small businesses
educational opportunities including college financial aid
universal healthcare for all adults and children
civil rights for all, including the right to marry
sensible sex education and reproductive rights including abortion
violence prevention and response
fair housing
emergency response for crisis situations
protection of the country from terrorist attacks, especially port security
Not all candidates will adhere with all my values. In those cases, I choose the candidate who is most in line with my thoughts. I weigh situations like these by reflecting upon the relative importance of the positions in comparison with the opportunity to make an impact. I learned this method as a teen studying Catholic social teaching in relation to politics - for example, while many Catholics are encouraged to vote for the Republican candidate because of their position on abortion, the Church teaches it is important to look at the candidate's views on all social teaching (dealth penalty, caring for the poor, economic opportunities, nonviolence) and not just one "wedge issue" or "litmus test" for moral decisions. In doing this, you can often find that the Democratic candidate usually comes out on top. This method has long been helpful to me in making my political decisions. I encourage you all to weigh your decisions using your own values.
Some of the personal experiences that have particularly shaped my beliefs this year are -
Hurricane Katrina - My cousin Carl was missing in New Orleans for nearly a week, and every hour I spent watching the U.S. government do nothing while people drowned and died was an hour I vowed I would never forget again when I voted. Thankfully, Carl survived, however not without loosing his home and experiencing extreme injury both mentally and physically.
The Isreali-Lebanon Conflict - My parents' neighbors, who are of Lebanese descent, were in Lebanon during the conflict's height. They were left without any help or assistance from the U.S. government, who essentially abandoned them during a time of war. Every day I imagined their youngest, a spitfire of a little girl, experiencing horrors far beyond her northwest Chicago childhood experience. Thankfully, they arrived home, but not without risking life and limb and driving out of the country themselves, without any asssistance from the U.S.
The continuing Iraq war - I have two close friends, one whom I consider a brother, serving in the military. Over the years I have seen the toll this has taken on them as they are sent again and again to fight wars without end and seemingly without purpose. One is currently in Iraq for the third time.
Because of these three experiences, I believe the current administration and Congress has betrayed the trust of the American people. If we cannot depend on our leaders to help us in times of natural disaster, international crisis, or war, when CAN we depend on them?
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
How I Decide / My Values
Posted by
JenDoesPolitics
at
11:56 PM
Labels: 2006 Election
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
hi jen. LOVING the blog. BUT. shouldn't we be voting GREEN for governor? i mean, isn't blago a sure bet, AND he sucks, and we could help out some greeny types? i know about the gun thing with green-y guy, but don't you think it might worth it to give him the percent he needs to be a legit party in illinois?
Good question. I don't think we should vote for the Green Party just to give them a percentage, and here's why - they don't deserve it. I wouldn't vote for Rich anyway because of his extreme gun position (how can you be the party of nonviolence and advocate for everyone openly carrying guns?) and my doubts about his experience level, but in general I think the Greens don't deserve a break as party. I'm actually going to write a post all about my annoyance with the Greens this year, but in brief - I think the Green Party has collapsed in recent years (post the Nader bump of 2000) and no longer deserves our respect. I say this because I don't think they show US, the voters, any respect. If you go to their website - http://www.ilgp.org/ - and look at the candidates they have slated for this election, its a joke. Half of them don't have websites, the ones that do don't have any positions on the issues, and the ones that have those two things are 26 years old theologians with only one year of work experience. Frankly, I find their choices insulting. I've always believed that they should start in the smaller races and build their way up, which would establish a little more credibility and sincerity than swooping in every four years and declaring yourself "the alternative" when everyone knows there's no chance of you winning anyway and you're just going to go sit around not doing anything for another four years. Man, I really need to write that post about the Greens, don't I?
WELL. i think that you make some fine points. i was very weary of rich's gun control position, but have been so dissapointed by blago. and topinka...what's she thinking? just kidding. anywho, i also think that the greens seems to come out of nowhere every time there is a major election. like the stalker who won't stop surprising you at the turn of the corner, and he's hot, but where's the back story? go jen. still LOVING.
hey jen. why do you think negative campaigning works? i think it's because people don't know who to vote for, so parties decide to try and tell people who not to vote for. it's the easy way to do it. especially during these mid term elections, some of my most responsible friends have no idea what to do. i must admit, i don't. it's interesting that while people pretend to have disdain for negative campaigning, they wouldn't run them unless the ads worked, you know?
It is weird, isn't it. I mean, everyone is negative, so I think that kind of contributes to overall voter apathy and disgust with all the candidates. Although I do think that ads have been getting more and more negative in recent years. There was something on Larry King about this last week, and there is a study that they did that says negative campaigns actually work. I found this article about it - http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/4308772.html
Post a Comment